“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force.
Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”
That line has echoed through American political philosophy for generations because it captures something we keep forgetting: power doesn’t announce itself when it grows. It expands quietly, structurally, through infrastructure that looks harmless until the day it isn’t.
And lately, that infrastructure has been sprouting on street corners, intersections, and neighborhood entrances across the country — including right here in our city.
Small black boxes. Solar panels. A pole. Nothing flashy. Nothing ominous. Just another piece of “smart city” hardware.
Except it isn’t.
It’s a Flock Safety license plate reader, and it represents one of the biggest shifts in public surveillance architecture in decades — a shift most people haven’t even noticed.
The New Surveillance Grid We Didn’t Vote On
Flock cameras are marketed as crime‑fighting tools. They scan license plates, log vehicle movement, and store that data for weeks or months depending on the contract. Police departments can search it, cross‑reference it, and share it across jurisdictions.
In other words:
A private company now operates a regional movement‑tracking network that governments can tap into at will.
No public vote. Minimal oversight. Zero meaningful transparency.
This is how surveillance grows in America — not through dramatic announcements, but through quiet installations.
The Trojan Horse of “Safety”
Every expansion of state power arrives wrapped in the same emotional packaging: “It’s for your safety.”
And that’s the trick.
Because once the infrastructure exists, the temptation to use it expands. Once the data is collected, the incentive to repurpose it grows. Once the public gets used to it, the resistance fades.
Surveillance doesn’t need a villain to be dangerous. It only needs capability.
The fearful master doesn’t appear overnight — it’s built, bolt by bolt, camera by camera.
The Real Risk Isn’t Today — It’s Tomorrow
Maybe the people in charge today are responsible. Maybe they’re not abusing the system. Maybe the intentions are good.
But systems outlive the people who build them.
The danger isn’t who controls the cameras now. The danger is who could control them later.
A surveillance grid doesn’t care who sits in office. It doesn’t care what laws change. It doesn’t care what crisis gets declared.
It simply waits for someone with the authority — or the ambition — to use it.
That’s the architecture of overreach.
The Watching City Is Being Built Quietly
Most people don’t notice these cameras. Most people don’t know what they do. Most people assume they’re harmless.
But the truth is simple:
We are building a city where movement is logged, tracked, and stored — by default.
Not because the public demanded it. Not because we debated it. But because the infrastructure slipped in under the radar.
This is how fire spreads: quietly, invisibly, until the room is already warm.
The Question Every Citizen Should Ask
Forget politics. Forget parties. Forget today’s headlines.
Ask yourself one thing:
Do you want a government — any government — to have the ability to track every car you drive, everywhere you go, for months at a time?
If the answer is no, then the Flock Camera system isn’t just a tech issue. It’s a freedom issue. A legacy issue. A future‑architecture issue.
Because once the grid is built, it doesn’t go away. And once the fire is lit, it doesn’t ask permission before it spreads.
If this sparked clarity or offered quiet leverage, you’re welcome to support via the [Buy Me a Coffee link below].
The views expressed in this post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any affiliated individuals or organizations.
No comments:
Post a Comment